I decided to show you in person the censorship issues in China. Here’s a quick example of how “sensitive” searches can kick you off sites like Wikipedia and Google. Pretty good all around example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Bck3Zoattg

Freetibet.org: IE Message of Doom
(It took me many hours to put this post up. The internet was a lot slower when I was editing this and I had to go through a lot of hassle just to post it, who knows exactly why…)
Online censorship during the Olympics. What exactly does that mean for us that surf the web in China? It is important that China promised unfettered media access during the Olympics: http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-07-08-voa28.cfm. Although, how complete is that media access? Those of us on the inside are very well acquainted with the Internet Explorer Message of Doom. While you can get search results through Google, opening these sites is a different story. Google images are especially finicky- many images come up with the little red X in the corner, like a side-view of a deceased rectangle monster. James Reynolds of the BBC once described his search as Click, Wait, IE Doom Message, Click, Wait, IE Doom Message… he got a lot of flak from the netizens out there for having a plush job. Click and wait would be nice to be paid for.

Free Tibet Google Images: Dead Rectangle Monster
But honestly, checking this sort of access is absolutely crucial to studying freedom of the media in China. It was one of the most exhilarating moments of my stay here to finally access the forbidden Amnesty International’s Official Website (all caps on purpose, mind you). Media restrictions have been greatly relaxed over the past two weeks, mostly due to an uproarious foreign media community when they realized they couldn’t access many sites at the Olympic Media Village. See- sometimes international pressure does work. But how far does this censorship rabbit hole go? I have done a little testing over the past few weeks of sites that were off limits three weeks ago. On the first day of supposed media openness I went search happy with all the sensitive things I could think of and our entire office lost internet connection for about an hour… could be coincidence, and maybe I’m paranoid, but still…
Amnesty International:
Accessible, pretty much all the time. All reports are downloadable and visible. Major progress here.
BBC (in Chinese):
Off and on accessibility. The real problem is that it just looks accessible. When I try to click on stories they all come up as the dreaded IE can’t access screen. It’s a complete Potemkin village of media censorship on this site. It appears to work fine until you scratch the surface. Sometimes it works, but mostly not. All English BBC reports are visible, including ones that are critical of China, and always accessible, except James Reynolds’ blog which is 50/50. I think this might be more likely to internal BBC stuff than the Chinese “Man.” This is a huge step, as before March the BBC was never available.
Wikipedia (in Chinese):
Just try and type in Tiananmen Square. I dare you- so I did. I got an innocuous report about the history of the square, its importance to Chinese dynasties, blah blah (in Mandarin.) No mention of 6/4 (the Tiananmen Square Incident). I tried Falun Gong and BOOM! No more web access to Wikipedia for about 10 minutes. Kicked off, just like that. Wikipedia in English first became accessible two years ago during my summer in China. Now, it depends on what you search before you are booted off. The Chinese version is about 80% off, 20% on.
Youtube:
It depends on what you search. Anything about the Tiananmen video or Tibet protests and you can maybe watch 3-5 minutes before your connection gets cut. I feel honored that my video of us getting kicked off the bridge during the Opening Ceremony was at one point inaccessible, as well all of youtube, for me. They must have really liked it to have checked it that thoroughly!
Facebook:
Everyone has problems with Facebook all over Asia. So I don’t know if my connection problems are due to censorship within China- but it really isn’t stable. Just thought you should know.
Tibet reports:
Anything that is pro-Tibet independence is hard to find. Party line, or anti-Tibet stuff is not a problem to access at all.
Blogs, like this one:
I knew a high school student with a photo blog that wrote about Tibet, and he even wrote it like this: T!bet. He didn’t write anything but the name- nothing political. Still, a month ago you could not get access his site. Now look- I have written pretty much every sensitive word in the book on this blog and I have no problem seeing it from Beijing and writing for it. This is a huge leap forward.
Online Newspapers:
Depends, really. Some are totally blocked- others only depending on what they write. It’s hit or miss.
So, everyone is asking, will this openness last after the Olympics? Unprecedented media access has not led to the fall of the government as so many on the inside feared. I attribute this to 1.) A distinct distrust by Chinese of foreign media. Foreign media, like the BBC, are heavily attacked by Chinese newspapers as anti-China and therefore untrustworthy and biased news sources. Whenever I cite bad things happening in China, even citing the source and showing it to my friends, it’s still looked at as untrustworthy. I remember one person I knew said that these pictures of the Qingdao algae had to have been photo-shopped to make China look bad before the Olympics: http://www.sail-world.com/photos/Med_assetContent.act.jpg 2.) Many people within China don’t take the time, or are unable, to read English news reports. In this respect, even if there are glaring differences in reports made by the state-run media and foreign media people don’t know about it. 3.) People don’t really care. When you live in a system where the prevailing sentiment is “I’m too small to change my government” it really doesn’t matter what is said or done. If you’re life is going well otherwise- who cares?
There are enclaves of active Chinese netizens that bypass “The Great Firewall” through proxy servers to get news from Taiwan and overseas Chinese. Often great scandals are revealed this way and flow over the internet as underground stories. China has one of the most complex and intricate online surveillance apparatuses in the world, so the Man often keeps track of these stories and deletes them when possible. There have been some huge incidences that were covered up, like riots in southern China after a CCP official raped a girl and hired thugs beat up her uncle when he sued for justice. Also, a man in Shanghai stabbed police officers at a police station. The reason, or so the netizens report, was that a year earlier the police had beaten him after he complained of unfair treatment by the police over a small incident. The man was traveling in Shanghai with a bike that he claimed he had rented but the police said he had stolen. They had beaten him so badly that he lost the ability to reproduce. He was so enraged that he stabbed some workers at the police station a year later. The Chinese media only reported on the stabbings, not the reasons behind them until they were forced to condemn all the internet accusations as lies. They then arrested a group of people that had protested the incident and wrote their opinions online. The list goes on and on. James Reynolds posted this on his blog about the forced migration of people living in the way of progress: (WARNING: This is a violent incident and might not be suitable for all readers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6mbT9HlSp0) The point is, these stories are not getting reported, or inaccurately reported, by the state-run media but English reports are now accessible for the most part within China. I will not say that “Western” media is perfect, far from it. But I have problems with the bias argument because most, like the BBC, criticize all governments. To me, I trust a BBC report far more than Xinhua- but then again, I grew up in the “West.” No one likes to be criticized, but I believe criticism from outside observers is critical for positive change. I do not criticize China to cause harm, but as one who wants to facilitate positive change and offer a different point of view. The difference is important, although often lost with the China vs. US mentality, which is how criticism is received. A common rebuttal to criticism about the Chinese government is “But your government does this…” (Note that I also heavily criticize my own government, and I believe it is my duty to do so as a citizen).
To sum up, media access is not as perfect as was hoped. Indeed, there are still strict restrictions on Chinese accessible sites, which are the most important in facilitating accurate news. Just because most reporters are English speakers doesn’t mean they shouldn’t care about access to the Chinese language portions of their own news sites. If these people want change then this is what needs to be accessible. I found this article to be an accurate depiction of the new policies here: http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/beijing_olympics/china_officials_give_up_on_censoring_world_settle_for_their_own_citizens_91373.asp
For me, I genuinely hope this increased media access trend will continue after the Olympics. This may be the lasting political legacy of the Games. In my opinion a free, independent, and most importantly critical media will be the impetus for liberal change in the Middle Kingdom.
p.s. I am quite aware of the sensitivity of what I have written above, and I honestly believe my blog may become blocked in China at some point in the future. If this happens I will email my posts directly to the Daily Camera. I understand that I run the risk (although probably very small) of being blacklisted here in China and unable to get a visa in the future due to these posts. I accept that risk.